Economics treats ideas as the engine of growth, then files their origins under “exogenous.”
I think that's a cop-out, so I study the origins directly. My current work follows
the question across four terrains: what happens when you pay people for ideas
(a $20 GitHub sponsorship can crowd out the
community work that open source runs on); how
local governments in Brazil build — and lose — state
capacity; how proximity moves invention between people; and how deep
the roots go, down to our neural wiring. Underneath all four runs one conviction: as AI makes
execution cheap, open ideas — inventions left in the commons — matter more than ever, yet we
still provision public goods inefficiently. The work is figuring out how to provide them better.
I got here the long way: two degrees at Cornell (biometry & statistics, applied
economics & management), a reproducibility stint at the American Economic Association, antitrust
data science on healthcare mergers at Charles River Associates, and now the TIES PhD
at MIT Sloan, where I get to spend my time thinking about questions in economics that
explore the provision of innovation in public-goods ecosystems. Along the route I kept building things —
R packages, mapping tools, LLM pipelines that read sixteen million paragraphs of Brazilian
municipal gazettes — because the questions I like are the ones existing instruments can't measure yet.
Off the clock I collect cities and their transit systems, draw maps nobody asked for,
and am perpetually one attempt away from biking hands-free.